My Thoughts on: Marxism, Living Under American Capitalism, Marxian Philosophy, Baseball, Economics, Alcohol, and any other topic I feel like writing about.
19 January 2012
Pew Results, Positive and Negative, Capitalism and Socialism by Demographic
These numbers, published by the Pew Research Center are a little disheartening. Mostly because of the title they place on them of "Little Change...".
I ask this: Do we need a survey to know that old rich white people like capitalism and don't like socialism? (Check the numbers people)
I also ask this: How many people that support the Tea Party movement have even a faint inkling of what socialism would look like (that isn't based upon American propaganda of the bleak government controlled East circa 1970)?
Numbers are fun, the work from the Pew here is a great example of that, if nothing else.
As an aside regarding my graphic for this post. Anyone else annoyed by Lenin being included here?
Crossing Boundaries of Economic Commentary
Albeit for very different reasons:
Respected colleague, David Ruccio, and Harvard's answer to Hitler, Greg Mankiw have the exact same quote on their respective blogs this morning.
View Ruccio's here
View Mankiw's here
What is this world coming to?
PS, I am not claiming that N. Gregory Mankiw is anti-Semitic. The reference to Hitler is as one who knowingly indoctrinates his followers with false and dangerous information to serve his own purposes.
Respected colleague, David Ruccio, and Harvard's answer to Hitler, Greg Mankiw have the exact same quote on their respective blogs this morning.
View Ruccio's here
View Mankiw's here
What is this world coming to?
PS, I am not claiming that N. Gregory Mankiw is anti-Semitic. The reference to Hitler is as one who knowingly indoctrinates his followers with false and dangerous information to serve his own purposes.
13 January 2012
Has Anyone Else Given Up on The Daily Show?
I come and go with television in general. I have spent portions of my life without TV at all, yet when I am sick or burnt out on work I do enjoy watching certain programs.
Over the past year I have been lucky enough to live with a wonderful person, unrelated to her wonderfulness, she also gets cable and has a dvr.
One of my guilty pleasures over the past year has been watching Jon Stewart's The Daily Show.
I enjoy the anger, sarcasim, etc. as well as Stewart's sense of humor.
Over the past month or so I have found the show becoming almost unwatchable. This is mostly due to the coverage of the Republican primaries. I don't dispute that the collection of candidates (as well as our current president from the other party) make for some amusing moments with their idiocy and ability to ignore what politics is "really about". My problem is largely that The Daily Show writers seem to have forgotten that a world exists outside of the Republican party. The Daily Republican Party might be a more appropriate title for the show over the past 30 or so days.
Of course Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, and my personal hero Ron Paul*cough* (as far as contemporary American politicians go), deserve criticism and coverage of their idiocy but enough is enough, and a couple minutes a day is enough!
Essentially by spending all of the show on Republican politicians (even in a critical light) the writers of The Daily Show are sending the message that these politicians, and the broken process of pseudo democracy that exists in this country are worth devoting more time to than anything else (including the ongoing collapse of capitalism, and the occupy movement) currently happening in the US or world.
I have made this same argument about spending too much academic energy on critiquing some of the lesser points of Neoclassical economics, too much energy spent in the critique validates the existence of the object. Are these people really worth covering? The US political system is broken. If we spend to much time on these clowns it will only encourage them.
This then is a call to The Daily Show: Stop making these bourgeois idiots feel important by devoting all of your time to them! I would love to start watching again.
Over the past year I have been lucky enough to live with a wonderful person, unrelated to her wonderfulness, she also gets cable and has a dvr.
One of my guilty pleasures over the past year has been watching Jon Stewart's The Daily Show.
I enjoy the anger, sarcasim, etc. as well as Stewart's sense of humor.
Over the past month or so I have found the show becoming almost unwatchable. This is mostly due to the coverage of the Republican primaries. I don't dispute that the collection of candidates (as well as our current president from the other party) make for some amusing moments with their idiocy and ability to ignore what politics is "really about". My problem is largely that The Daily Show writers seem to have forgotten that a world exists outside of the Republican party. The Daily Republican Party might be a more appropriate title for the show over the past 30 or so days.
Of course Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, and my personal hero Ron Paul*cough* (as far as contemporary American politicians go), deserve criticism and coverage of their idiocy but enough is enough, and a couple minutes a day is enough!
Essentially by spending all of the show on Republican politicians (even in a critical light) the writers of The Daily Show are sending the message that these politicians, and the broken process of pseudo democracy that exists in this country are worth devoting more time to than anything else (including the ongoing collapse of capitalism, and the occupy movement) currently happening in the US or world.
I have made this same argument about spending too much academic energy on critiquing some of the lesser points of Neoclassical economics, too much energy spent in the critique validates the existence of the object. Are these people really worth covering? The US political system is broken. If we spend to much time on these clowns it will only encourage them.
This then is a call to The Daily Show: Stop making these bourgeois idiots feel important by devoting all of your time to them! I would love to start watching again.
12 January 2012
Verlander and Taco Bell: Marketing at its Best!
I wonder how much Taco Bell payed Justin Verlander to publicly announce the he ate their crap before every start in last year's Cy Young winning season?
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-big-league-stew/justin-verlander-reveals-secret-success-conan-taco-bell-155538696.html
Anyone who actually eats Taco Bell 30 plus times a summer would; best case scenario look like me, and worst case scenario be dead.
Oh well...Product differentiation through advertising remains important in the non-neoclassical world of fast food.
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-big-league-stew/justin-verlander-reveals-secret-success-conan-taco-bell-155538696.html
Anyone who actually eats Taco Bell 30 plus times a summer would; best case scenario look like me, and worst case scenario be dead.
Oh well...Product differentiation through advertising remains important in the non-neoclassical world of fast food.
Labels:
advertising,
Detroit Tigers,
product differentiation
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)